Blazing iconBlazing

Akash Provider

Edit on GitHub

Configure Akash Network for decentralized, cost-effective overflow capacity

Akash Network is a decentralized compute marketplace with global capacity, offering the lowest costs and maximum geographic diversity as an emergency fallback provider.

What is Akash Network?

Akash is a peer-to-peer cloud compute marketplace where:

  • Anyone can offer compute capacity
  • Users bid on available resources
  • Providers compete on price and performance
  • No central authority controls the network

When to Use Akash

✅ Emergency overflow capacity (fallback status)

YAML

✅ Cost-sensitive batch workloads

YAML

✅ Geographic diversity (50+ countries)

YAML

❌ Production databases (variable uptime) ❌ Compliance-sensitive workloads (no guarantees) ❌ Real-time applications (latency variability) ❌ Baseline capacity (use prefer status)

Basic Configuration

YAML

Configuration Reference

Status Field

YAML

Strong Recommendation: Use fallback status only.

| Status | Recommended | Reason | |--------|-------------|--------| | fallback | ✅ Yes | Safe overflow capacity | | allow | ⚠️ Sometimes | Testing or very cost-sensitive | | prefer | ❌ No | Too variable for primary |

Public Gateway Configuration

YAML

Recommendation: Disable Akash gateway, use GCP instead:

YAML

Akash gateways are:

  • Provider-dependent (variable reliability)
  • Not load-balanced
  • Limited monitoring

Complete Examples

Safe Fallback Configuration

Primary: GCP + DFC, Fallback: Akash

YAML

Result:

  • GCP handles baseline (reliable)
  • DFC handles burst (cost-effective)
  • Akash handles extreme overflow (rare)

Cost-Optimized Testing

Aggressive cost savings for dev/test:

YAML

Warning: Only for non-production environments.

Batch Processing Configuration

Long-running batch jobs:

YAML

Use Case: Video encoding, data processing, simulations

Akash Network Characteristics

Costs

Lowest in the industry:

| Resource | Akash | DFC | GCP | |----------|-------|-----|-----| | 2 CPU, 4GB RAM | $12/mo | $24/mo | $45/mo | | 4 CPU, 8GB RAM | $24/mo | $48/mo | $90/mo | | 8 CPU, 16GB RAM | $48/mo | $96/mo | $180/mo | | Egress (1TB) | $0 | $0 | $5/mo |

Savings: 70-80% vs GCP, 50% vs DFC

Global Coverage

Akash providers in 50+ countries:

North America: USA, Canada, Mexico South America: Brazil, Argentina, Chile Europe: 30+ countries (UK, Germany, France, etc.) Asia: India, Singapore, Japan, South Korea Africa: South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria Oceania: Australia, New Zealand

Provider Characteristics

| Aspect | Typical Range | Notes | |--------|---------------|-------| | Uptime | 85-99.5% | Highly variable | | Performance | Variable | No SLA | | Latency | Regional | Depends on location | | Support | Community | No enterprise support |

Akash Bidding System

How Bidding Works

  1. You specify requirements:

    YAML

  2. Providers bid:

    Plain Text

  3. Server selects winner:

    • Lowest price (if prefer/allow)
    • Available capacity (if fallback)
    • Geographic constraints

Price Volatility

Akash pricing fluctuates based on:

  • Network demand
  • Provider supply
  • Geographic region
  • Resource type (CPU vs GPU)

Example: Same workload over 30 days:

  • Low: $8/month
  • High: $15/month
  • Average: $12/month

Mitigation: Use fallback status for predictable baseline costs.

Akash Features

Compute

  • ✅ CPU: Any size
  • ✅ Memory: Any size
  • ✅ GPU: NVIDIA, AMD (provider-dependent)
  • ⚠️ Autoscaling: Supported but slower
  • ✅ Spot pricing: Built-in (all is "spot")

Networking

  • ✅ Zero egress fees
  • ⚠️ Public IPs: Provider-dependent
  • ⚠️ TLS: Manual or gateway-based
  • ⚠️ Load balancing: Limited
  • ⚠️ IPv6: Provider-dependent

Storage

  • ⚠️ Persistent volumes: Provider-dependent (risky)
  • ✅ Ephemeral storage: Yes
  • ⚠️ Encrypted volumes: Provider-dependent
  • ❌ Managed databases: Not recommended

Security & Compliance

  • ⚠️ VPC isolation: Provider-dependent
  • ⚠️ Network policies: Basic K8s
  • ❌ Confidential compute: Not available
  • ❌ Compliance certifications: None

Best Practices

1. Use as Fallback Only

YAML

This ensures:

  • Predictable costs (Akash rarely used)
  • Reliable baseline (GCP/DFC handle normal load)
  • Emergency capacity (Akash available for spikes)

2. Disable Public Gateway

YAML

Akash gateways are unreliable for production traffic.

3. Stateless Workloads Only

Good: API servers, workers, batch jobs

YAML

Bad: Databases, caches, stateful apps

4. Set Realistic Expectations

Akash is:

  • ✅ Cheap
  • ✅ Globally distributed
  • ❌ Not reliable
  • ❌ Not compliant
  • ❌ Not for production baseline

5. Monitor Closely

YAML

Watch for:

  • Frequent pod restarts
  • High latency
  • Provider unavailability

Limitations

Hard Limitations

  1. No SLA: Providers can go offline anytime
  2. No compliance: No GDPR, SOC2, PCI-DSS guarantees
  3. Variable performance: CPU/network speeds vary
  4. Community support: No enterprise helpdesk
  5. Limited observability: Provider-dependent monitoring

Practical Limitations

  1. Deployment time: Slower than GCP/DFC (bidding process)
  2. Provider churn: May need to migrate between providers
  3. Network isolation: Limited inter-service networking
  4. Storage reliability: Persistent volumes risky
  5. Debugging: Limited access to underlying infrastructure

Troubleshooting

"No bids received"

Issue: No Akash providers bidding on your deployment

Causes:

  • Resources too large (e.g., 64 CPU)
  • GPU requirements (limited availability)
  • Price ceiling too low

Solutions:

  1. Reduce resources:

    YAML

  2. Remove GPU requirement temporarily:

    YAML

  3. Add DFC as fallback:

    YAML

"Pod keeps restarting on Akash"

Issue: Akash provider unstable

Solution: Exclude problematic providers (future feature):

YAML

Temporary fix: Promote DFC/GCP:

YAML

"High latency from Akash"

Issue: Provider in distant geographic region

Solution: Use geographic scope:

YAML

Akash will only bid from North American providers.

"Akash costs higher than expected"

Issue: Bidding prices increased due to demand

Solution: Set maximum budget in org policy:

YAML

Akash vs DFC vs GCP

Quick Comparison

| Factor | GCP | DFC | Akash | |--------|-----|-----|-------| | Reliability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | | Cost | $$$$ | $$ | $ | | Compliance | ✅ Full | ⚠️ Self-cert | ❌ None | | Support | ✅ Enterprise | ✅ Email | ⚠️ Community | | Geographic | 35+ regions | 8+ locations | 50+ countries | | SLA | 99.95% | ~99% | None | | Egress fees | $0.005/GB | $0 | $0 |

Decision Matrix

Use GCP when:

  • Production baseline
  • Compliance required
  • Need SLA
  • Databases

Use DFC when:

  • Cost-sensitive
  • Burst capacity
  • Stateless workloads
  • No strict compliance

Use Akash when:

  • Extreme cost optimization
  • Emergency overflow
  • Batch processing
  • Testing/dev environments

Roadmap

Akash Network Roadmap

  • Confidential Compute: TEE support (2026)
  • Provider Tiers: Certified vs community providers
  • SLA Options: Premium providers with guarantees
  • Persistent Storage: Replicated, reliable storage layer

Blazing Integration Roadmap

  • Provider scoring: AI-driven provider selection
  • Blacklist support: Exclude bad providers
  • Cost caps: Per-provider budget limits
  • Performance monitoring: Real-time provider metrics

Next Steps

DFC Provider Configuration